<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VMware, SaaS, and the Virtual Appliance Marketplace</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mikedipetrillo.com/mikedvirtualization/2009/04/vmware-saas-and-the-virtual-appliance-marketplace.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mikedipetrillo.com/mikedvirtualization/2009/04/vmware-saas-and-the-virtual-appliance-marketplace.html</link>
	<description>A Technologist and Virtualization Expert</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 06:48:40 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Massimo Re Ferre&#39;</title>
		<link>http://www.mikedipetrillo.com/mikedvirtualization/2009/04/vmware-saas-and-the-virtual-appliance-marketplace.html/comment-page-1#comment-629</link>
		<dc:creator>Massimo Re Ferre&#39;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 07:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikedipetrillo.com/mikedvirtualization/?p=493#comment-629</guid>
		<description>Mark,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;the fundamental difference, in my opinion, is that with SalesForce (or alike) the application doesn&#039;t run in your own data center but rather &quot;somewhere else&quot;. Virtual Appliances are just a (very clever) mean to repackage an application for smarter distribution. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I guess that instantiating a Virtual Appliance on the Cloud would be much closer to SaaS. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Massimo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>the fundamental difference, in my opinion, is that with SalesForce (or alike) the application doesn&#39;t run in your own data center but rather &#8220;somewhere else&#8221;. Virtual Appliances are just a (very clever) mean to repackage an application for smarter distribution. </p>
<p>I guess that instantiating a Virtual Appliance on the Cloud would be much closer to SaaS. </p>
<p>Massimo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.mikedipetrillo.com/mikedvirtualization/2009/04/vmware-saas-and-the-virtual-appliance-marketplace.html/comment-page-1#comment-627</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 21:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikedipetrillo.com/mikedvirtualization/?p=493#comment-627</guid>
		<description>The appliance model has some parallels with SaaS ease of deployment benefits but allows more control of the security aspects - however I would argue it is not a simple as just downloading the virtual appliance since it still needs to be installed on your VMWare infrastructure – which is relatively simple – but it also needs to be managed and tracked in any efficient production environment. Since the KBOX appliance focuses on systems management we’ve taken that message to heart in our definition of an appliance and built in “self management”. This covers areas like self tuning for load distribution and automating typical maintenance tasks such as nightly backups. So IT can focus on using the appliance to complete their work rather than creating more admin tasks. Again this brings the appliance model even closer to SaaS without the security issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The appliance model has some parallels with SaaS ease of deployment benefits but allows more control of the security aspects &#8211; however I would argue it is not a simple as just downloading the virtual appliance since it still needs to be installed on your VMWare infrastructure – which is relatively simple – but it also needs to be managed and tracked in any efficient production environment. Since the KBOX appliance focuses on systems management we’ve taken that message to heart in our definition of an appliance and built in “self management”. This covers areas like self tuning for load distribution and automating typical maintenance tasks such as nightly backups. So IT can focus on using the appliance to complete their work rather than creating more admin tasks. Again this brings the appliance model even closer to SaaS without the security issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VMware Appliance Marketplace v2</title>
		<link>http://www.mikedipetrillo.com/mikedvirtualization/2009/04/vmware-saas-and-the-virtual-appliance-marketplace.html/comment-page-1#comment-617</link>
		<dc:creator>VMware Appliance Marketplace v2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 13:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikedipetrillo.com/mikedvirtualization/?p=493#comment-617</guid>
		<description>[...] Appliance Marketplace v2 VMwarePost by Mike DiPetrilloAdd comments               In my previous post I talked about how the Virtual Appliance Marketplace (VAM) is VMware&#8217;s play in the SaaS [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Appliance Marketplace v2 VMwarePost by Mike DiPetrilloAdd comments               In my previous post I talked about how the Virtual Appliance Marketplace (VAM) is VMware&#8217;s play in the SaaS [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
